Online Reading Time and Topic Tracker
A browser plugin that tracks my online behaviour and provides visual graphs on what I'm doing.
A plugin that tracks my eye ball movement, time spent reading an article, parts of text I selected, etc. This data is then presented as a visual graph showing topics I read about, etc.
+[項目]
嗨，[賈斯汀]，您認爲還有什麼值得追蹤的指標來衡量人們在瀏覽網絡時學到了什麼？
Hey [Justin], what else do you think it's worth tracking to measure what people learn when they browse the web?
好主意，這當然是可行的。因此，從事計算機視覺研究的統計學家，計算機科學家和數據科學家衆多。您需要的是計算機上分辨率更高的相機，或[現有解決方案]（tobii）將眼球用作鼠標。
[ruta], good idea, which certainly is doable. So many statisticians, computer scientists and data scientists working on computer vision. What you need, is a higher resolution cameras on computers, or existing solutions (tobii) to use your eyeballs as mouse.
順便說一句，在命名上更具體一些，因爲此“在線行爲跟蹤器”非常籠統，可能比眼動跟蹤更重要。也許是“在線閱讀時間和主題跟蹤器”。
[ruta], btw., be more specific in the naming, because this 'Online Behaviour Tracker' is very general, could refer to much more than eye-tracking. Maybe 'Online Reading Time and Topic Tracker'.
[敏迪]
>在命名上要更具體，因爲此“在線行爲跟蹤器”非常籠統，可能不僅僅涉及眼動跟蹤。也許是“在線閱讀時間和主題跟蹤器”。
-那麼這是一個項目，而不是一個主意。沒有？
[Mindey],
-- this is a project then, not an idea anymore. no?
最初，項目與構想之間的區別在於，項目涉及特定人羣，使用特定工具來嘗試交付特定的可交付成果。僅僅降低一個想法的普遍性並不能使它成爲一個項目。添加具體人員，工具和範圍。創意可以是非常具體和詳細的，就像專利一樣，但它不是沒有特定時間和空間，人員，工具和現實世界範圍的項目。 :)
[ruta], originally, the difference between a project and an idea is that a project concerns specific group of people, using specific tools, trying to deliver specific deliverable. Just reducing the generality of an idea does not make it into a project. Adding concrete people and tools and scope does. Idea can be very specific and detailed, like a patent, but it is not a project without specific time and space, people, tools, scope in real world. :)
[Mindey]，好的，知道了！有時間軸，人員，工具等的創意便成爲計劃。謝謝！
[Mindey], okay, got it! An Idea becomes a plan when it has timeline, people, tools, etc. Thanks!
>好主意，這當然是可行的。因此，從事計算機視覺研究的統計學家，計算機科學家和數據科學家衆多。您需要的是計算機上的高分辨率相機，或將眼球用作鼠標的現有解決方案（tobii）。
[Mindey]，熱圖如何獲取有關我如何與頁面互動的數據？
[Mindey], how about heatmaps, to get the data on how I interact with the page?
熱圖只是顯示點擊密度的一種方法，您的問題是首先收集有關眼球的數據點，並推斷從該數據中讀取的實際單詞和主題，例如鼠標指針數據以及其他數據。
[ruta], heatmaps are only a way to display the click density,... Your problem is to collect data points about the eyeballs first, and infer the actual words and topics read from that data, - the mouse pointer data, and other data.
[Mindey]，如果我們考慮人們在網上閱讀的方式，我們會發現我們許多人在閱讀時會突出顯示文本。我的假設是，當我們突出顯示文本時，我們會反思正在閱讀的內容。我使用各種Web裁剪器來保存內容以供以後使用（即[Evernote]（http://evernote.com“ http://evernote.com”））。我還使用[Rescuetime]（http://Rescuetime.com“ www.Rescuetime.com”）跟蹤我的Web瀏覽行爲。也許有更簡單的方法可以解決此問題，而不是跟蹤眼球？
[Mindey], if we think about how people read online, we'll see that many of us highlight text while reading. My assumption is, when we highlight text, we reflect on what we are reading. I use various web clippers to save content for later (i.e Evernote). I also use Rescuetime to track my web browsing behaviour. Maybe there are simpler ways to solve this problem instead of tracking eye balls?
魯塔，很好的觀察。確實，閱讀期間的選擇可以用作數據源，並且可以製作一個瀏覽器插件來收集您訪問的所有網站上的信息。可以構建統計模型來過濾該信息，但像提到的（tobii）那樣具有眼球跟蹤器會更加準確。
[ruta], very good observation. Indeed, selections during the reading could be used as data source, and a browser plugin could be made to collect that information on all websites you visit. Statistical models could be constructed to filter that information, but it would be much more accurate to have eyeball trackers, like the mentioned (tobii).