Application of Fractals in Society
What is a practical application of Fractal Geometry?
+
–
–
I watched a movie on Fractals. It seems to me that such thinking is useful when creating new technologies. But I wonder beyond that.
沒有子分類。
+[問題]
+[想法]
+[項目]
我們與Struppi進行了夢幻般的探索！我們研究了作爲磁鐵的球體和向量，以及它們如何相互連接成穩定的結構。
筆記：
-2作爲最低限度的系統（“沒有別人，你就無法認識自己”）
-球體爲內部/外部/邊界（“人與自然之間沒有邊界，因爲我們是共享的空氣”）
-生命有多種形式（多形式）
-多中心結構（“每個人都可以成爲宇宙的中心”）
-作爲平衡關係的三角形（例如，微小的球體爲立方體和四邊形）。
我們計劃繼續探索並走進一步的道路：研究一下協同作用的一般原理，並想象一些實際的例子，說明如果四面體是基本結構還是立方體，那麼我們的世界會是什麼樣（城市是什麼樣？社區是什麼？等等）
We had a fantastic exploration with Struppi! We played with spheres and vectors as magnets, and how they connect with one another into stable structures.
Notes:
2 as a minimum system ("you cannot know thyself without the other")
Spheres as inside/outside/boundary ("no boundary between a human and nature because we're a shared air")
Life having many forms (polyforms)
Polycentric structure ("everyone can be a center of the Universe")
Triangle as a balanced relationship (example of tiny spheres as a cube and as a tetra)..
We plan to continue exploring and go further: take general principles of synergetics and imagine practical examples of how would our world look like if tetrahedron is the basic structure vs cube (how would a city look like? a community? and so on)
[+]
我昨天問曼蘇爾“我們的項目如何分形？”他的回答是，它是針對特定項目的。但是一個普遍的想法是：“元素可以同步在一起以創建一個整體，而不是其各個部分”。
I asked Mansoor yesterday "how our projects can be fractal?" His answer was that it's project-specific. But a general idea is: "Elements can sync together to create a whole greater than its parts".
//“愛因斯坦（Albert Einstein）拒絕相信擲骰子神。他寫給馬克斯·伯恩（Max Born）的一封信中說：“您相信一個上帝，我會在完整的法律和秩序中扮演骰子。”因此，他顯然感到偶然性和確定性法律不相容。他喜歡確定性定律。現在，Mandelbrot的場景，混亂和相關的事情對我們所做的就是表明您可以同時擁有這兩者。重要的不是上帝是否玩骰子。上帝就是這樣玩骰子的。” -伊恩·斯圖爾特教授（46:00）//
-對隨機性和順序感到好奇。我們可以從“分形”中學到什麼，以在我們的人類生活和社會中擁有更多的流動性？
// “Albert Einstein refused to believe in a dice-playing deity. He wrote a letter to Max Born in which he said, ‘You believe in a God who plays dice and I in complete law and order.’ So, he obviously felt that chance and deterministic laws were not compatible. He preferred the deterministic laws. Now, what the Mandelbrot set and chaos and related things have done for us is to show that you can have both at the same time. It is not whether God plays dice that matters. It is how God plays dice.” — Prof. Ian Stewart (46:00) //
在與任何一個朋友交談之前（上面的評論），我看完電影后就在博客上寫了一篇反思。
現在，我意識到可以用多種方式來解釋任何主題：在我個人對朋友的思考和反饋中，我有很多不同的觀點。這使我認爲個人和集體思考都很重要。
Before I talked to any of my friends (comments above), I wrote a reflection on my blog straight after watching a movie.
Now I realise that any topic can be interpreted in many ways: I have quite different points on my individual reflection and feedback from my friends. That makes me think that thinking individually and collectively are both important.