Missing institutions
I feel that our society exposes citizens to raw edges of markets. There must be a way to blunt the effects of markets on people. Markets are a good thing but they have unintended effects on people's livelihoods.
+
–
–
This question is to highlight the missing institutions of society. Things that don't exist that should.
沒有子分類。
+[問題]
+[想法]
+[項目]
人們可以想到一個機構來關心任意的小事，例如“市場準入”或“補貼”。但是，西方世界似乎選擇的最優化方法，是依靠不斷發展和篩選獲勝者，而不是培育和幫助失敗者成長。我認爲，它又來自達爾文優化心態，爲了創造這種新心態，我們必須將失敗者視爲離羣值-具有非凡潛力的種子-因爲它們之所以成爲失敗者，也許是因爲它們處於錯誤的土壤中，而不是因爲它們固有地不合適。有了這種想法，就可以發明出類似“異常局面培育”的機構，該機構專注於挖掘未開發的人才和觀點。
One can think of an institution to care about arbitrary little thing, for example, "Market Access" or "Subsidy". However, the very way of optimization that the Western world seem to have chosen, relies on evolving and screening for the winners, not nurturing and helping the losers to grow up. I think, it again comes from the Darwinian Optimization mentality, and to create that new mentality, we've got to think of the losers as the outliers, -- seeds with unusual potential -- because, the reasons why they are losers, perhaps, is because they are in the wrong soil, not because they are inherently unfit. With that thinking, something like an institution for "Nurture of Outliers" focused on mining untapped talent and perspectives may be invented.
對每一個失敗的企業進行驗屍，人們發現導致他們失敗的原因。
我們應該有0個失敗的業務計劃和0個工作損失（特殊原因除外）。
社會應該是脆弱的。
A post mortem on every failed business ever where people discover what caused them to fail.
We should have 0 failed business plans and 0 job losses (except for exceptional causes).
Society should be antifragile.