Irreconcilable differences
People have different opinions. How do we avoid tyranny from the minority or majority?
+
–
People have different points of view. I don't want people whom I despise or people who I disagree with to make laws that apply to me.
This category is for ideas to produce solutions to irreconcilable differences
沒有子分類。
+[問題]
想法 World splitting
Imagine there are two points of view - one way to avoid conflict is to put both points of view into practice and try them both to see which is better.
+[想法]
+[項目]
我們認爲不可調和的差異,實際上是價值體系的衝突,因爲我們賦予感知的價值:爬行動物在炎熱的烘烤中可能非常放鬆,而北極熊可能會在炎熱的天氣中感到同樣的放鬆。寒冷:兩者都需要更高的需求——“感覺放鬆”——通過將具體需求轉化爲抽象需求來協調差異。
解決這個問題的另一種方法是改變神經迴路,這些神經迴路向這些感覺發出信號,滿足更抽象的要求,如放鬆或興奮等。 有時感覺可能與生理不相容,然後生理也需要改變,如果想和另一個人享受同樣的東西……
Something what we think of irreconcilable differences, in fact are clashes of value systems, because of the values that we assign to perceptions: a reptile may be extremely relaxed baking in a scorching heat, whereas a polar bear may feel the same kind of relaxation in a freezing cold: both have a need for the higher need -- "feeling relaxed" -- a difference reconciled by translation of concrete requirements to abstract ones.
Another way to fix that, is just by changing neural circuits that signal those senses the satisfaction of more abstract requirements like the relaxation or excitement, etc. Sometimes the feelings may be incompatible with physiology, and then the physiology needs to change too, if one wants enjoy the same things as another...
另見——機器人會夢見電羊嗎?
See also —— Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?
我不知道如何解決每個社區中的衝突的確切答案,但它們確實在健康的社區內得到解決,通過社區陽離子以及愛和善良。我認爲我們能做的最好的事情就是將社會組織成一個更精細的自治社區結構。然後,它會變得更好,從基層開始。
I don't know exact answer how to resolve conflicts in each community, but they do get resolved inside healthy communities, thru communities cations and love and kindness. I think the best we can do is to organize society into a more granular structure of autonomous communities. Then, it'll just get better, from grassroots.