MRSGREN digital organism interface
A menu system for organisations
A group of human beings want to do something together, so they need some way to relay information and make decisions.
Each person in an organism is a unit that can be commanded and can produce communications to the central point. What if we had a digital system to collect this information, how would it be structured?
I propose MRSGREN as a system for acquiring consensus. MRSGREN the acronym stands for what makes something alive.
Movement, Respiration, Sensing, Growth, Respiration, Excretion, Eating (Nutrition).
Each action in the world is carried out by one of these actions. For example, sensing is how the group of people "see" things around them, for something to be discussed, it must be sensed, so someone as to add the thing being sensed to the system, by creating a new record in the system.
Things in the system can be prioritized, so I imagine a radar system where things closest to the middle are the immediate priority.
Movement is to take action in the world, so to make a decision is a movement. Or a command to command someone to do something. There would be a menu to command others to take a position in the world such as gather data, or acquire resources.
因此，您的假設是所有生物都具有：1.運動2.呼吸3.感覺4.生長5.呼吸6.排泄7.飲食8.（營養）我知道了假設的來源，但是您是否嘗試過抽象此外，例如：“呼吸”，“飲食”和“排泄”具有相同的質量，因爲“吸入”是“飲食”，“呼氣”是“空氣排泄”，因此，我們離開了較少的方面。 1.運動2.感知3.成長4.排泄5.飲食6.（營養）如果您認爲“增長”作爲一個廣義的概念，包括自然而然地編碼在其餘過程中的結果，因此是多餘的？ 1.運動2.感覺3.排泄4.飲食5.（營養）如果您認爲“營養”在各個層次上都是均衡的，您是否認爲“營養”同樣可以用“飲食”和“排泄”來概括？ 1.運動2.感覺3.排泄4.喫你是否注意到“運動”和“感覺”都具有非物質性（即，交換力量）？您是否注意到“排泄”和“飲食”都具有物質性（即物質交換）？爲什麼不用以下術語來概括該界面：1.輸入（飲食，感覺）2.輸出（排泄，運動）3.力（運動，傳感）4.物質（飲食，排泄）？
So, your hypothesis is that all organisms have:
I see where the hypothesis comes from, but had you tried to abstract it further, for example: "respiration", "eating" and "excretion" share the same quality, in that "inhalation" is "eating of air" and "exhalation" is "excretion of air", and thus, we are left with fewer aspects.
Had you thought that "Growth", as a broad concept, includes the results of processes coded in the rest as natural consequence, and thus is redundant?
Had you thought that "Nutrition" similarly is summarized by "Eating" and "Excretion", if they are thought of as balance at various levels?
Had you noticed that "Movement" and "Sensing" both share non-material-ness (i.e., exchange of force)? Had you noticed that "Excretion" and "Eating" both share material-ness (i.e., exchange of matter)?
Why not to summarize that interface in the following terms instead:
?
//輸入（飲食，感覺）輸出（排泄，運動）力（運動，傳感）問題（飲食，排泄）//有用！
// Input (Eating, Sensing) Output (Excretion, Movement) Force (Movement, Sensing) Matter (Eating, Excretion) //
Useful!
將一個新人帶入組織就是飲食/營養。處理廢物就是排泄物。做某事就是呼吸。
Taking a new person into the organisation is eating/nutrition.
Disposing of waste is excretion.
To make something is respiration.
增長不是多餘的，因爲您需要做廣告或招聘。
Growth is not redundant because you need to advertise or recruit.